Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos385 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Crisis results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 769 hits. Analysis detected 8,342 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,564 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,079 of 15,906 topics). This Financial Crisis is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Financial Crisis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,564
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.3%11.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.7%11.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 6.1%6.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos