Topic summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video816 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fighter Aircraft results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 2,085 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,487 of 16,562 topics). This Fighter Aircraft is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Fighter Aircraft
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,448
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510060.8% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.9%14.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.9%9.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 4.3%4.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.3%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos