Author summary
45% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kaif Shaikh results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 485 hits . Analysis detected 4,098 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,572 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (3,108 of 6,628 authors). This Kaif Shaikh is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. Kaif Shaikh
Author details
Total words: 4,572
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.6% 10.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.7% 6.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.5% 10.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 10.5%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.3% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst