Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fertility Rates results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 901 hits. Analysis detected 7,713 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,648 of 16,562 topics). This Fertility Rates is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
Fertility Rates
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,916
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.1%10.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Straw Man: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos