Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wendy R. Wang results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 901 hits . Analysis detected 7,713 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,584 of 6,629 authors). This Wendy R. Wang is better (less manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group. Wendy R. Wang
Author details
Total words: 8,916
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.1% 10.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Straw Man: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst