Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video436 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Prison Sentence results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.4% saturation with 565 hits. Analysis detected 2,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,744 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,111 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Prison Sentence is worse (more manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.
Federal Prison Sentence
Topic details
Total words: 1,744
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.2% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 11.6%11.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 32.4%32.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.9%7.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 32.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos