Topic summary
⁠92%3 analyzed articles/videos3,646 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Drug Policy results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 2,596 hits. Analysis detected 10,850 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,938 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (6,770 of 15,397 topics). This Federal Drug Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Federal Drug Policy
Topic details
Total words: 10,938
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.4%12.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos