Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 6,504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Chappell results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 5,690 hits . Analysis detected 26,987 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,569 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,455 of 6,218 authors). This Bill Chappell is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group. Bill Chappell
Author details
Total words: 20,569
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.5% percentile 3.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles20.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 8.1% 8.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.2% 9.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 27.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst