Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video338 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Court results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 169 hits. Analysis detected 1,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,389 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Court is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Federal Court
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,352
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.4% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.5%12.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.2%10.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Topic 5.2%5.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.7%5.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Red Herring: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos