Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video684 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fda Regulation results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 320 hits. Analysis detected 3,097 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,392 of 16,562 topics). This Fda Regulation is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Fda Regulation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,736
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.4% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Middle Ground: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Special Pleading: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos