Topic summary
⁠60%3 analyzed articles/videos3,104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Far Right Politics results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 1,686 hits. Analysis detected 10,181 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,220 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (10,668 of 15,689 topics). This Far Right Politics is better (less manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
Far Right Politics
Topic details
Total words: 10,220
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.5%16.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos