Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Family Tragedy results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hindsight Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 40.6% saturation with 923 hits . Analysis detected 4,390 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,271 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 86% (2,401 of 16,562 topics). This Family Tragedy is worse (more manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group. Family Tragedy
Topic details
Total words: 2,271
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.5% percentile 6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 40.6% 40.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 21.2% 21.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Topic 40.6%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.1% Red Herring: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.7% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst