Topic summary
⁠29%2 analyzed articles/videos1,101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Family Support results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 524 hits. Analysis detected 4,007 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,634 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,922 of 16,562 topics). This Family Support is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group.
Family Support
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,634
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.2% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.4%14.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.5%8.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.7%9.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.5%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos