Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,318 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Family Planning results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,193 hits. Analysis detected 7,327 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,272 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,977 of 16,562 topics). This Family Planning is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Family Planning
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,272
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos