Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,070 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Spoerre results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Ad Hominem , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 1,232 hits . Analysis detected 9,765 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,280 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (5,177 of 6,628 authors). This Anna Spoerre is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group. Anna Spoerre
Author details
Total words: 12,280
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst