Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Family Life In Politics results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 670 hits. Analysis detected 4,799 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,286 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Family Life In Politics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Family Life In Politics
Topic details
Total words: 3,286
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 15.3%15.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.8%14.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos