Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video126 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Family Economics results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 160 hits. Analysis detected 752 faulty-reasoning hits from 504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (413 of 16,562 topics). This Family Economics is worse (more manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group.
Family Economics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 504
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

98% percentile
025507510097.5% percentile
16.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles504 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 31.8%31.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 26.2%26.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 19.1%19.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.5%9.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.5%16.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 28.4%28.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Topic 31.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Topic 28.4%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Topic 26.2%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%False DilemmaSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos