Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,032 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Faa results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 444 hits. Analysis detected 2,545 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,536 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,349 of 16,562 topics). This Faa is better (less manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group.
Faa
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,536
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos