Topic summary
36%1 analyzed article/video959 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Exoplanet Atmospheres results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Overconfidence Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 276 hits. Analysis detected 2,462 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,877 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (9,035 of 16,562 topics). This Exoplanet Atmospheres is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Exoplanet Atmospheres
Topic details
Total words: 2,877
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.6%9.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos