Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evolutionary Psychology results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 412 hits . Analysis detected 4,282 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,411 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (8,980 of 16,562 topics). This Evolutionary Psychology is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group. Evolutionary Psychology
Topic details
Total words: 4,411
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.8% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst