Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin R. Garcia results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 46.8% saturation with 198 hits . Analysis detected 1,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 423 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.6% and a BS Rank of 99% (101 of 6,172 authors). This Justin R. Garcia is worse (more manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group. Justin R. Garcia
Author details
Total words: 423
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.4% percentile 17.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles423 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 46.8% 46.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 32.1% 32.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 35.2% 35.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 31.4% 31.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 17.0% 17.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 22.5% 22.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 41.4% 41.4% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Author 12.1% 12.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 18.0% 18.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.5% 8.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Author 46.8%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Author 41.4%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 35.2%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 32.1%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Emotion: Author 31.4%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 22.5%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 18.0%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 17.0%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 17.0%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Nature: Author 12.1%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Author 12.1%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 10.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 4.0% Primacy Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 8.5%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Author 7.1%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst