Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,371 analyzed words
BS Summary: These European Defense Spending results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 728 hits. Analysis detected 4,668 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,288 of 16,562 topics). This European Defense Spending is better (less manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group.
European Defense Spending
Topic details
Total words: 5,484
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510031.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.3%13.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos