Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eu Energy Policy results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 382 hits. Analysis detected 1,293 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,015 of 16,562 topics). This Eu Energy Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Eu Energy Policy
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠58%Eu Energy Policy (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,016
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.6% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.9%18.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.5%8.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos