Topic summary
⁠40%2 analyzed articles/videos1,349 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Etiquette results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 442 hits. Analysis detected 4,785 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,396 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,367 of 16,562 topics). This Etiquette is better (less manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Etiquette
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.3% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.8%5.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos