Miss Manners: Are pregnant women supposed to hide now? 47%

By Judith Martin56% Nicholas Ivor Martin56% Jacobina Martin56%

7/13/2026, 8:27:04 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.8% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 1,278 faulty-reasoning hits from 553 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.3% and a BS Rank of 47% (11,780 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 53.80% of the article peer group.

DEAR MISS MANNERS: 
After several miscarriages, a friend is finally pregnant via IVF. 
While the couple is thrilled, they often find themselves in the presence of others who are having trouble conceiving or who have given up. 
Since they had their share of trouble, they certainly understand, but it’s as if their mere presence is now resented. 
At a recent event, where they made no mention of the baby, two other guests having trouble conceiving actually said this couple shouldn’t have come “with her belly.” 
My friend was even asked by family not to have a shower because of a relative who is having trouble getting pregnant. 
Do pregnant women and mothers with babies now have to hide lest they be seen as insensitive just by existing? 
GENTLE READER: This is one of the saddest letters Miss Manners has ever received. 
Not because of the difficulties of conceiving, which is tragic enough, but because of what it says about our relationships to one another. 
These are their friends, and they have been through the same struggles! 
But instead of rejoicing with them, others are shunning them. 
Is that how these people would want to be treated if they were eventually successful? 
Must we consider life to be a zero-sum game, where one person’s happiness is a blight to others? 
If the still-childless people cannot be happy that their friends were successful, can't they at least try to see it as hope that perseverance might be rewarded? 
Comparing oneself with others leads to a miserable life. 
One can always find someone who is richer, better looking or more successful. 
You have only to go on social media to find countless examples of idealized lives that are driving teenagers, and probably others, to despair. 
Miss Manners understands sensitivity. 
She knows that there are times when people cannot cope with normal life going on around them. 
That is why there used to be secluded mourning periods for the bereaved. 
The solution is not to try to suppress normal life and begrudge others their good fortune. 
The way to think of others is with empathy. 
DEAR MISS MANNERS: I had a good friend who had these lavish dinner parties in her perfect house. 
I reciprocated often, but started to feel intimidated because we had to move to smaller places and are just not able to be fancy with parties anymore. 
I think people who go all out giving perfect dinner parties intimidate friends who cannot do the same. 
That’s why they don't reciprocate. 
GENTLE READER: And that's the thanks they get for going to a lot of trouble to give you a splendid dinner? 
You say this was a good friend, so presumably the main attraction at these dinner parties was enjoying her company, not competing over the format of the gathering. 
What your friend deserves is evidence that you like being with her enough to initiate an occasional gathering. 
Miss Manners assures you that not doing so plants the idea that while you are willing to dine out, you are not interested in more contact. 
Please send your questions to Miss Manners at her website, www.missmanners.com; to her email, gentlereader@missmanners.com; or through postal mail to Miss Manners, Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.2%East Bay Times: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Judith Martin: 4.3%East Bay Times: 2.6%Availability Heuristic6.1%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Judith Martin: 1.7%East Bay Times: 3.5%Framing Effect5.2%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.4%Judith Martin: 0.6%East Bay Times: 0.4%Status Quo Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.0%Judith Martin: 3.2%East Bay Times: 2.0%Optimism Bias8.0%This article: 9.6%Judith Martin: 2.4%East Bay Times: 1.3%Pessimism Bias9.6%This article: 39.8%Judith Martin: 9.9%East Bay Times: 7.9%Negativity Bias39.8%This article: 4.9%Judith Martin: 2.4%East Bay Times: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias4.9%This article: 6.9%Judith Martin: 5.1%East Bay Times: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error6.9%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Judith Martin: 1.1%East Bay Times: 0.8%In-Group Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 7.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Judith Martin: 0.7%East Bay Times: 0.8%Recency Bias2.7%This article: 5.1%Judith Martin: 1.3%East Bay Times: 0.4%Primacy Effect5.1%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 2.1%East Bay Times: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.0%Judith Martin: 2.0%East Bay Times: 2.5%Appeal to Authority8.0%This article: 16.3%Judith Martin: 7.3%East Bay Times: 1.1%False Dilemma16.3%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 24.1%Judith Martin: 9.8%East Bay Times: 3.4%Hasty Generalization24.1%This article: 4.2%Judith Martin: 1.0%East Bay Times: 0.4%Red Herring4.2%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.5%Judith Martin: 5.4%East Bay Times: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion8.5%This article: 1.6%Judith Martin: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.5%Begging the Question1.6%This article: 5.2%Judith Martin: 2.4%East Bay Times: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.2%This article: 3.8%Judith Martin: 1.6%East Bay Times: 0.3%Tu Quoque3.8%This article: 9.6%Judith Martin: 2.4%East Bay Times: 0.6%Burden of Proof9.6%This article: 2.4%Judith Martin: 0.6%East Bay Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature2.4%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 21.7%Judith Martin: 5.4%East Bay Times: 2.3%Anecdotal21.7%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.7%Judith Martin: 2.2%East Bay Times: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.7%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 1.3%East Bay Times: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 10.8%Judith Martin: 4.3%East Bay Times: 8.1%Biased Writer Voice10.8%This article: 7.8%Judith Martin: 3.6%East Bay Times: 2.8%Indoctrination7.8%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Judith Martin: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Judith Martin: 1.4%East Bay Times: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.8%

553 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.