Topic summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Interactions results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, False Dilemma, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 1,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,299 of 16,562 topics). This Social Interactions is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Social Interactions
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠50%Social Interactions (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,212
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.9% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.3%7.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos