Keyword summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Insensitive results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, False Dilemma, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 1,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (17,950 of 37,536 keywords). This Insensitive is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Insensitive
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠53%Insensitive (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,212
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

52% percentile
025507510052.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.2%0.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 7.3%7.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos