Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,093 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Adams results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 1,933 hits . Analysis detected 11,027 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,535 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 71% (4,868 of 16,562 topics). This Eric Adams is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group. Eric Adams
Topic details
Total words: 6,535
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.6% percentile 4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 18.6% 18.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 24.8% 24.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 29.6% 29.6% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 29.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 24.8%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Horn Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.0% Special Pleading: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst