Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,093 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Adams results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 1,933 hits. Analysis detected 11,027 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,535 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 71% (4,868 of 16,562 topics). This Eric Adams is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
Eric Adams
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,535
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.6% percentile
4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 18.6%18.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.8%24.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.7%7.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 29.6%29.6%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 29.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.8%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Horn Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.0%Special Pleading: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate