Topic summary
97% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,936 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Epstein Files Release results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 2,720 hits . Analysis detected 17,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,799 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 72% (4,785 of 16,562 topics). This Epstein Files Release is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Epstein Files Release
Topic details
Total words: 8,799
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.1% percentile 4.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 30.9% 30.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 21.5% 21.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 30.9%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.7% Horn Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.0% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
MS NOW 95% 12/23/2025, 9:13:11 AM
MS NOW 95% 12/20/2025, 1:58:49 PM
MS NOW 95% 12/20/2025, 12:39:19 PM