Topic summary
34% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Hazards results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 1,578 hits . Analysis detected 12,277 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,496 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (14,248 of 15,534 topics). This Environmental Hazards is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group. Environmental Hazards
Topic details
Total words: 17,496
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles17.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst