Topic summary
39%3 analyzed articles/videos3,079 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Entomology results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 691 hits. Analysis detected 7,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,677 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,466 of 16,562 topics). This Entomology is better (less manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Entomology
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,677
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.7%6.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate