Topic summary
⁠72%2 analyzed articles/videos838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These England National Football Team results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 1,278 hits. Analysis detected 7,990 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,476 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,060 of 16,562 topics). This England National Football Team is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
England National Football Team
Topic details
Total words: 5,476
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.4% percentile
3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.3%23.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 6.7%6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.6%10.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos