Author summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Steinberg results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 537 hits . Analysis detected 2,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,786 of 6,628 authors). This Jacob Steinberg is worse (more manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group. Jacob Steinberg
Author details
Total words: 3,352
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.0% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst