Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,077 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Supply Chain results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 39.8% saturation with 1,287 hits. Analysis detected 7,188 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,231 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,888 of 16,562 topics). This Energy Supply Chain is worse (more manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group.
Energy Supply Chain
Topic details
Total words: 3,231
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510088.6% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 22.2%22.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 28.6%28.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 21.2%21.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 23.3%23.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 39.8%39.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.6%27.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.3%9.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 39.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 28.6%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.6%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 23.3%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.3%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos