Topic summary
28% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,155 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Infrastructure Attacks results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , False Dilemma , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 733 hits . Analysis detected 4,959 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,200 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (11,011 of 16,562 topics). This Energy Infrastructure Attacks is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Energy Infrastructure Attacks
Topic details
Total words: 7,200
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst