Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Worthy Christian News results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 181 hits . Analysis detected 1,270 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 398 publications). This Worthy Christian News is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 2,580
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst