Topic summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 1,635 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Bills results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 347 hits . Analysis detected 4,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,905 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (9,962 of 16,562 topics). This Energy Bills is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Energy Bills
Topic details
Total words: 4,905
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst