Topic summary
⁠68%3 analyzed articles/videos1,733 analyzed words
BS Summary: These End Of Life Care results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 933 hits. Analysis detected 7,488 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,239 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (11,782 of 16,562 topics). This End Of Life Care is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group.
End Of Life Care
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,239
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510028.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos