Topic summary
⁠92%2 analyzed articles/videos1,557 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Employment Trends results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 725 hits. Analysis detected 5,353 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,418 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,220 of 16,562 topics). This Employment Trends is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Employment Trends
Topic details
Total words: 5,418
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.4% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.4%12.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.4%13.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos