Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos638 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Employee Bonuses results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37.1% saturation with 710 hits. Analysis detected 4,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,914 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,609 of 15,328 topics). This Employee Bonuses is worse (more manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group.
Employee Bonuses
Topic details
Total words: 1,914
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510089.5% percentile
8.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 26.3%26.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 35.1%35.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 37.1%37.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 10.9%10.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 15.3%15.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 13.9%13.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 37.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 35.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos