Topic summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video599 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elon Musk's Political Involvement results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 373 hits. Analysis detected 2,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,198 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,478 of 16,562 topics). This Elon Musk's Political Involvement is worse (more manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group.
Elon Musk's Political Involvement
Topic details
Total words: 1,198
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510085.0% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.5%29.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 31.1%31.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 16.4%16.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.6%15.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 31.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos