Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,232 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elise Stefanik results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.3% saturation with 1,195 hits. Analysis detected 9,996 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,696 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,616 of 15,328 topics). This Elise Stefanik is worse (more manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group.
Elise Stefanik
Topic details
Total words: 3,696
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510089.5% percentile
8.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 23.1%23.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 19.4%19.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 17.8%17.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 20.2%20.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 10.7%10.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 32.3%32.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.0%7.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 32.3%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.3%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Horn Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.0%Special Pleading: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate