Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,232 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elise Stefanik results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.3% saturation with 1,195 hits . Analysis detected 9,996 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,696 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,616 of 15,328 topics). This Elise Stefanik is worse (more manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group. Elise Stefanik
Topic details
Total words: 3,696
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.5% percentile 8.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 23.1% 23.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 19.4% 19.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 17.8% 17.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 20.2% 20.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 32.3% 32.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 32.3%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.3%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Horn Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.0% Special Pleading: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.3% Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst