Topic summary
⁠95%2 analyzed articles/videos3,183 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Strategy results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 2,770 hits. Analysis detected 15,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,549 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,078 of 15,565 topics). This Economic Strategy is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Economic Strategy
Topic details
Total words: 9,549
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.5% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.0%29.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.3%15.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.6%12.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos