Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 909 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Forecast results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Loss Aversion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 36.5% saturation with 664 hits . Analysis detected 2,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,818 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,038 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Forecast is worse (more manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group. Economic Forecast
Topic details
Total words: 1,818
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.7% percentile 7.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 36.5% 36.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 16.9% 16.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.1% 15.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 36.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 26.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Gambler’s Fallacy: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst