Author summary
74% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,606 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Eason results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Pessimism Bias , and Loss Aversion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 921 hits . Analysis detected 3,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,909 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,387 of 6,355 authors). This Brian Eason is worse (more manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group. Brian Eason
Author details
Total words: 3,909
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.4% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.8% 6.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 7.1% 7.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.6% 23.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Loss Aversion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Slippery Slope: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst