Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video354 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Concerns results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 292 hits. Analysis detected 2,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ā 84% (2,680 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Concerns is worse (more manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group.
Economic Concerns
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 84%Economic Concerns (selected)7%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510083.8% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 20.6%20.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.8%14.8%Politically Left Leaning ā€¦Sitewide 2.0%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.6%12.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.2%10.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 20.6%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos