BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 700 faulty-reasoning hits from 354 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

People hold up images of crowns with red lines through them during the “No Kings” national day of protest in Atlanta, Georgia, on March 28, 2026. 
(Photo by Elijah Nouvelage / AFP via Getty Images) 
Another round of “No Kings” protests is taking place in cities across the nation in opposition to the Trump administration. 
Organizers of more than 3,100 demonstrations and rallies across all 50 states on Saturday speculated that they could be among the largest protests in U.S. history, estimating more than 9 million people to participate. 
The second “No Kings” event in October drew about 7 million people nationwide, while the first one in June, known as a “day of defiance,” attracted roughly 5 million. 
The rally at the Minnesota State Capitol in St. 
Paul is said to be the flagship event, as the state saw a crackdown on illegal immigration in recent months with the Trump administration deploying thousands of federal immigration officers to Democrat-led Minnesota. 
Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) is scheduled to speak in St. 
Paul, as well as singer-songwriter Bruce Springsteen and actress Jane Fonda. 
“Anti-authoritarian” groups Indivisible and 50501 will be represented at the rallies, as well as labor unions and other grassroots organizations. 
“Since the last No Kings, we’re seeing higher gas prices and groceries, all while there’s an illegal war in Iran,” said Sarah Parker, the executive director of Voices of Florida and a national coordinator for the 50501 movement. 
“The people of America are pissed.” 
The rise of gasoline prices occurred shortly after the Trump administration launched Operation Epic Fury, a joint campaign with Israel to decimate Iran’s military capabilities and prevent the Islamic regime from developing a nuclear weapon. 
The conflict has reached the one-month mark as President Donald Trump negotiates with the remaining leadership in Tehran. 
He reported this week that Iranian officials sent the United States 10 oil tankers through the otherwise closed-off Strait of Hormuz to show that they were legitimate. 
BREAKING: Massive crowds already in Philadelphia for the No Kings Protest this morning. 
Philly really hates Trump. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 5.9%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.9%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Katherine Mosack: 3.5%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic9.6%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.7%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.7%Katherine Mosack: 16.3%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect14.7%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.6%Katherine Mosack: 4.0%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 17.2%Katherine Mosack: 15.0%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias17.2%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.6%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Katherine Mosack: 3.4%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error9.3%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 4.9%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 5.1%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 4.6%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.8%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.9%Katherine Mosack: 1.3%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias11.9%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 4.6%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 5.9%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 2.5%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.4%Katherine Mosack: 5.8%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization12.4%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 11.9%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon11.9%This article: 6.5%Katherine Mosack: 11.3%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion6.5%This article: 10.7%Katherine Mosack: 3.2%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question10.7%This article: 20.6%Katherine Mosack: 3.3%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)20.6%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 9.3%Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division9.3%This article: 2.8%Katherine Mosack: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal2.8%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 22.9%Katherine Mosack: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)22.9%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.6%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 2.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.7%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection1.7%This article: 15.8%Katherine Mosack: 6.3%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice15.8%This article: 10.7%Katherine Mosack: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination10.7%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.2%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.3%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

354 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers15%attributed speech300writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageSenator Bernie Sanders • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageSarah Parker • 38 words • 100.0% coverageSarah Parker • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sarah Parker

100%flagged-word coverage
44 attributed words81% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%45.0%90.0%Indoctrination+86.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sarah Parker: 86.4%86.4%Biased Writer Voice-18.7 ptsWriter: 18.7%Sarah Parker: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+13.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sarah Parker: 13.6%13.6%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.