Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,562 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jane Fonda results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 713 hits. Analysis detected 7,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,955 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,541 of 37,536 keywords). This Jane Fonda is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Jane Fonda
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
59%Jane Fonda (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,955
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510058.6% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.0%12.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos