Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 915 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jane Fonda results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 410 hits . Analysis detected 3,637 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,285 of 6,628 authors). This Jane Fonda is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Jane Fonda
Author details
Total words: 3,660
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.2% 11.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst