Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These East Oakland results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 917 hits. Analysis detected 6,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,893 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,989 of 16,562 topics). This East Oakland is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
East Oakland
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,893
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos